- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:03:13 -0800
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Feb 12, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Shelley Powers wrote: > At least two members of this team, Ian Hickson[1] and Anne van > Kesteren[2], representing Google and Opera, respectively, have been > writing this morning that Adobe is officially blocking publication > of HTML5. This type of communication could cause FUD among the > community of users, and should be addressed as soon as possible. > > There was something in the minutes yesterday about a formal > objection from Larry Masinter [3], but the emails in this regard > went to a protected email list. However, Larry has discussed in the > www-archive list[4], a publicly accessible list, his objections to > the publication of Microdata, the RDFa document, and the Canvas 2D > API, but not the HTML5 document, itself. And the concerns I've read > in this list have to do with charter and scope -- a reasonable > concern, I feel. Others of us have also expressed a similar concern. > > An unfortunate consequence of lumping multiple documents into one > CfC is that there is some confusion about when an action or > objection is made against one, it seems to be against all. Yet, and > co-chairs, correct me if I'm wrong, but we can object to any one of > the documents, and it won't hold up up the publications of the > others. The lump CfC was a procedural short cut, not an actual > formal grouping. > > As far as we know of, there is no Formal Objection blocking the > publication of HTML5...correct? So far as I am aware, any objections that have been made were in Member-only space and via private contact to the W3C Team. Those with Member access can see some of the relevant email here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2010Feb/0100.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2010Feb/0108.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2010Feb/0110.html Since w3c-archive is Member-confidential, I'm not sure if I can convey any more information than that on a public list. It is up to the persons involved to decide whether to post any information publicly. As for Larry's charter scope inquiry on www-archive, this message presents the conclusion of the HTML WG Chairs and Team Contacts on discussing it: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Feb/0016.html Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 15:03:48 UTC