- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:52:44 -0600
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new revisions of the > following documents in accordance with the Working Group Heartbeat > requirements: > > HTML 5: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/ > HTML+RDFa: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ > > and to publish as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) the following > documents: > > HTML Microdata: http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/ > HTML Canvas 2D Context: http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/ > HTML: The Markup Language: http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/ > > Additionally, and as we have done with previous republications of the > HTML5 draft, the chairs would like to ask Anne to update the HTML5 diffs > from HTML4 to reflect the latest changes. Given that HTML+RDFa has been > introduced, and that Microdata and Canvas 2D Context have been split > out, since the last time this document was published, the chairs would > like to request that simple links to all three documents be provided. > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/html4-differences/ > > Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive > responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday, > February 17th, this resolution will carry. > > Considerations to note: > > - As a First Public Working Draft, this publication will trigger patent > policy review. > - As a Working Draft publication, the document does not need not be > complete, to meet all technical requirements, or to have consensus on > the contents. > - Objections may be made on specific documents but not on others. > Counting the differences document, there are effectively six different > documents under consideration at this time. I support publishing all of these. For my own curiosity, I'd like to know how RDFa 1.1 is coming along. Anyone have news? Since this is a deliverable, I'm interested in seeing it develop property, and am intrigued by the intimations of improvements. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 02:53:31 UTC