- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:36:26 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:40:04 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:37:08 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:18:29 +0100, Julian Reschke >>> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>>> Maybe a statement that this section is to be removed once this gets >>>> published as Note (is this what we're planning?). >>> I don't want to remove this section. It contains useful information. >> >> You want to keep the Change Log as part of the Differences document, >> even once we're finished? I applaud keeping a change log, but it really >> has no business in *this* document. >> >> Why would anybody looking for the differences between HTML4 and 5 be >> interested about when certain changes were applied, and then undone >> again? > > Once we're finished this document is only interesting as historical > artifact. I disagree. For people who actually wait to have standards, rather than drafts, this will be a very important document. On the other hand, I think that the summarised changelogs are useful as a handy reminder of progress while we are working on them. And I don't think it is hard to stop at the end of chapter 4 if you don't want to know. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 13:37:01 UTC