- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:11:43 +0000
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
ISSUE-27 is in the Pending Review state since this was requested at last week's WG meeting: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/127 So far we have had only one comment which Maciej has accepted. If there are no more comments by this week's WG meeting call I plan to propose that we close this action item and finalize the review policy. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:15 PM To: Jonas Sicking Cc: public-html@w3.org WG Subject: Re: Rough draft of Cross-Working Group Review Policy On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > I think it would be a good idea if the collected comments are posted > to public-html for review before being sent to the other WG. This is > not to try to gain consensus on the comments, but to allow the > individuals to ensure that their intended comments are reflected in > the submission. Good point. Let's assume that goes between step 4 and step 5. I'll post an updated version once we get some more comments. - Macie > > / Jonas > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> >> The following is my proposed revision of Paul's procedure for cross-WG review: >> >> >> = Proposed Policy for Cross-Working Group Review of Last Call Working Drafts = >> >> Often other Working Groups ask the HTML Working Group to review a Last Call Working Draft. Many Working Drafts impact our work. The intent of this policy is to facilitate review with a minimum of process overhead, and at the same time without accidentally misleading the receiving Working Group about the source and nature of the comments. >> >> We would take the following steps: >> >> 1) Chairs call for one or more volunteers to collect review comments from the Working Group. >> 2) Once chosen, the volunteer sets a deadline to provide comments. >> 3) Working Group members provide review comments. >> 4) The comments are collected and identified according to the person or persons who made or actively supported the comment. >> 5) The collected comments are submitted to the Working Group seeking review. The collected comments will be prefaced with a statement like the following: >> >> "These are collected comments from members of the HTML Working Group on FooBarML 4.2. Comments have not been reviewed for Working Group consensus. To follow up on a particular comments, please contact the individuals responsible for each comment as well as the HTML Working Group." >> >> In addition to the collected comments, Working Group members are also free to comment on Last Call Working Drafts of other groups individually. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:12:18 UTC