- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:53:53 -0600
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 21:54:43 UTC
Ian, others, We are working on canvas accessibility for the shadow DOM and I am working with the Mozilla team on the shadow DOM approach with some sample code from Microsoft. As we discussed, the use of media query of alternative content I am working to pull over a standard set of attributes from the IMS Access For All specification. It was suggested that we preface these with an aria-, however these are not part of the aria specification and preceding these with an aria- dash would not give credit to the IMS Access For All effort. I raised the suggestion that these be preceded with afa- but we agreed this would require agreement from the working group. For example, one attribute would be AdaptationType and we would define an equivalent CSS Media query property for it. What's the group on using afa- to preamble each attribute name? ... or should we just include the attributes without the afa-? As was requested they would not be limited to canvas content selection and at the moment I see no naming conflicts with existing HTML 5 attributes. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 21:54:43 UTC