- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:39:24 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> I'm curious, though: Is the document meant for the REC track (like >> some previous Primer documents from other WGs) or is it targeted to >> become a Working Group Note? > > I see that as a group decision. Do you have a recommendation? Going through the process to get to REC is useful for normative documents that can be implemented and demonstrate that with at least 2 interoperable implementations. There is no benefit to be gained from taking a non-normative document to REC, and only adds unnecessary process overhead. It's far easier to take non-normative documents to NOTE instead. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 11:39:56 UTC