- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:08:45 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli, Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:58:59 +0100: Commenting Henri: >>> 2) "hidden" in theory applies to non-accessibility unusual >>> modalities while "aria-hidden", in theory, only matters to >>> accessibility API mapping. > > See above. > >>> 3) "hidden" is part of the host language on the principle that ARIA >>> is a transitional solution and should become syntactically obsolete >>> as host languages gain enough features to address the use cases. > > (1) Some in this group see ARIA as something that should "take over": > E.g. we don't need @summary because we have this and that @aria- > attribute. > > (2) Your point 2) makes it sound as if you see aria-hidden and hidden > as same: we should need only one of them. I meant "your point 3)". -- leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 15:09:22 UTC