- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:26:52 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen, Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:32:20 +0200: > On Jan 31, 2010, at 23:11, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > >> http://www.amplesdk.com/examples/aml/maps/ >> >> The page is served as text/HTML (more specifically with the HTML5 >> doctype) - to all Web browsers, and implements AmpleSDK's XML language >> - AML - with namespaces and everything, inside the <script> element. >> >> Perhaps limiting namespaces to the <script> element and children of the >> <script> element is worth a shot? (My 2.5 cent.) > > The whole point of this technique is that the script element has no > element children when parsed as text/html. Putting an XML-looking > text child in script is already a permitted extension point. > (However, the xmlns:aml="http://www.amplesdk.com/ns/aml" bit on the > script start tag is not permitted by the spec.) OK - got it. ;-) But then there should also be no risk in allowing xmlns:aml="etc" on the very <scrip> element, I presume? -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 1 February 2010 10:27:25 UTC