- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:51:14 +0000
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>, Marco Zehe <marco.zehe@googlemail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > In Safari on Mac, the set of elements that is actually focusable depends on user preferences. Per spec, you are describing differences in whether the elements "can be reached using sequential focus navigation". The set of "focusable" elements includes elements that /cannot/ be reached using sequential focus navigation. That is, the spec distinguishes the concept of focusable from the tab cycle. See especially the normative requirement for negative tabindex: "The user agent must allow the element to be focused, but should not allow the element to be reached using sequential focus navigation." http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/editing.html#focus I guess the critical point here is that when an element receives focus, users must be made aware of what sort of control it is, so "presentation" makes no sense. So it seems that this wider definition of "focusable" is more important than the narrow tab cycle sense? -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 07:53:21 UTC