- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:47:35 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11479 Summary: add new row and rowgroup elements Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: jmichae3@yahoo.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org currently, browsers only apply background-color and maybe background-image css to col and colgroup elements. I don't know if this is the place for this, but I think it would be proper for col and colgroup, row, and rowgroup to at *least* have a class and a style attribute, and other "on..." events associated with the global attributes. also, MUCH more CSS would need to be applied to the col and colgroup, row and rowgroup elements, with the reasoning that whatever you can do with the row and rowgroup elements, you should be able to do with the col and colgroup elements. events, all kinds of css, etc. not sure if an id would make sense on a column - would it? maybe. depends on how you render it or treat it. I think row and rowgroup are logical companions for col and colgroup. I think they should have been there ever since tables began. If you had a red row and green col in a cross formation, I would think that the center would be red, unless the cell in the center has its own overriding color, because I would think the row has a higher priority, it being the closer-to-the-action element. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 07:47:37 UTC