- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:54:05 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Aug 15, 2010, at 3:02 , Ian Hickson wrote: > > I tried Googling "RFC-nottingham-http-link-header-10". This led me to: were you not able to follow the link on the IANA page? search for "link relations" on http://www.iana.org/protocols/ Or is googling preferred for those that work at google :-)? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-link-header/ > > This is a 27 page document. A quick glance at the table of contents > was unhelpful, but a scan through the document revealed section > "6.2.1. Registering new Link Relation Types", which for some reason is > not in the table of contents. The table of contents cover sections and their first-level sub-sections, pretty clearly. Section 6.2 has a pretty obvious title, in the index. "6.2. Link Relation Type Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10" The overall these of this email seems to be that it's easier to edit a wiki, than to write a stable specification, and register the code-points in it in a formal registry. Did we really need such an email to know that, or am I missing your point? David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 09:54:40 UTC