- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 06:05:04 -0400
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- CC: 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
On 08/14/2010 12:39 AM, John Foliot wrote: > Sam, > > I appear to be unable to submit my response to the Polling Questionnaire > system, despite trying from both work (Stanford) as well as from home > (Comcast); I receive in both instances the following error message: > > Proxy Error > > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. > The proxy server could not handle the request POST > /2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-109-objection-poll/. > > Reason: Error reading from remote server > > I do wish to enter a comment here, but given the issue I am experiencing I > am unclear on what I can do next. Appreciate any ideas or feedback you > can provide. On a previous poll, one individual had an issue, and it turned out to be an (undocumented) length restriction on input. I have no idea if that could be the case here; but given that responses are public anyway, one thing that might be worth trying is posting your objections to www-archive@w3-org and then posting a link to your objections in the survey. If that doesn't work for you, we will get the W3C staff to help. > Thanks > > JF - Sam Ruby >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Sam Ruby >> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 7:26 AM >> To: HTML WG >> Subject: ISSUE-109: aria-section-title - Straw Poll for Objections >> >> The poll is available here, and it will run through Thursday, August >> 19th: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-109-objection-poll/ >> >> Please read the introductory text before entering your response. >> >> In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only >> need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly >> strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked >> objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone else's >> objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and >> will not be counting votes. >> >> - Sam Ruby >
Received on Saturday, 14 August 2010 10:05:37 UTC