Re: Update on Issue-27, was: ACTION-182 and Issue-27

On 13.08.2010 12:59, Paul Cotton wrote:
>> 1a) "alternate"
>> (<>)
>> -- this currently is stuck because we haven't agreed on what the URI for
>> the referenced document should be; Ian proposed
>> <>, while I
>> think the registration should point to something more permanent, like an
>> actual Working Draft. Advice from the HTML WG appreciated.
> Would the following link from the June WD not satisfy the "more permanent" requirement:

It would (if it already contained the registration template, so we might 
have to wait for the next WD).

I also think that 
<> would work, 
because we would avoid having to update the registry every time a new WD 
comes out.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 11:08:50 UTC