- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:08:06 +0200
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 13.08.2010 12:59, Paul Cotton wrote: >> 1a) "alternate" >> (<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations/current/msg00025.html>) >> -- this currently is stuck because we haven't agreed on what the URI for >> the referenced document should be; Ian proposed >> <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#rel-alternate>, while I >> think the registration should point to something more permanent, like an >> actual Working Draft. Advice from the HTML WG appreciated. > > Would the following link from the June WD not satisfy the "more permanent" requirement: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20100624/links.html#link-type-alternate It would (if it already contained the registration template, so we might have to wait for the next WD). I also think that <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-alternate> would work, because we would avoid having to update the registry every time a new WD comes out. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 11:08:50 UTC