ACTION-103, Re: some conformance questions

On 18.06.2010 02:15, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Glazman
> <>  wrote:
>> Are you seriously asking to make about:blank invalid ???
> The draft spec at
> <>  says
> that about:blank should be a zero-length text/html document, so yes,
> it's non-conforming.  Firefox currently returns
> ...

Which reminds me: there doesn't seem to be any progress on actually 
*registering* "about:".

Joseph, Lachlan, I think the next step is to actually submit the text to 
the URI review mailing list, and also to request publication of the 
Internet Draft as RFC. Any idea when this is going to happen?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 10:16:06 UTC