W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2010

Re: request to re-open http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:10:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4C62934C.4040102@lachy.id.au>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 2010-08-11 13:35, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 04:23 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:
>> hi chairs,
>> I originally raised http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116
>> "provide reference and info about HTML5: Techniques for providing useful
>> text alternatives in html5 spec" 6th june 2010 as there had been no
>> response by the editor to
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9845
>> I was told by Sam Ruby "One week is *not* sufficient time to justify
>> raising an issue."
>> So i changed the status of the issue to postponed. It is now 8th of
>> August 2010 and there has been no action on the bug (along with
>> approximately 280 other bugs) after 2 months.
>> So I request at this time that I be allowed to re-open this issue.
> Agreed. Status is now OPEN.

This is a violation of the decision policy, which requires that the 
editor to have reviewed and responded to the issue in the bug before the 
issue is escalated.  Now given there are over 300 bugs in the queue, and 
the fact that Hixie cannot possibly get through all of them in just 2 
months, especially using the summer holiday period, there is 
insufficient justification for this issue to be reopened at this stage.

Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 12:11:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 11 August 2010 12:11:26 GMT