Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 2010-08-04 (public-html@w3.org from August 2010)

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:28:12 +0200
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org, tlr@w3.org, robin@robineko.com, "frederick.hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1280914092.2282.3905.camel@localhost>

Le lundi 26 juillet 2010 à 16:00 +0200, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:33:08 +0200, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>  
> wrote:
> > The Device APIs and Policy Working Group has published a new draft
> > called "HTML Media Capture" on which we think we'll need to coordinate
> > with your group:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html-media-capture-20100720/
> 
> Why is codecs not a DOMStringList or some such?

That seems more logical, indeed; I'll look into it; I think it makes the
reference to RFC 4281 a bit more complicated.

> Also, can FormatData maybe be named MediaFileData? Currently it looks very  
> similar to FormData (to me anyway) which is very different and overall  
> using a common prefix seems sensible.

Good point, I've renamed the interface.

Dom

Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2010 09:28:29 UTC