Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-82 profile-disambiguation by amicable resolution

On Apr 30, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Removing
>>
>>  ", and would therefore not be supported in conforming  
>> implementations"
>>
>> would address my objection.
>
> I've changed the sentence to be more precise:
>
>   The profile IDL attribute on head elements (with the HTMLHeadElement
>   interface) is intentionally omitted. Unless so required by another
>   applicable specification, implementations would therefore not  
> support
>   this attribute. (It is mentioned here as it was defined in a  
> previous
>   version of the DOM specifications.)

Julian, Jonas, are you guys ok with this wording?

  - Maciej

Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 23:22:41 UTC