- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:22:34 -0700
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > I was hoping to get responses such as those you've asked for. > > I can't believe that people dislike ALL of the change proposals, > equally. I think that the fact that the co-chairs grouped these from > the beginning has left them grouped, regardless of what people think > about the individual items. > > If some have less resistance than others, then I can figure out if I > need to strengthen my change proposals more, or consider dropping a > couple in order to focus on the rest. > > With them grouped, I'm stymied as to action, because these items are > not the same. They are very different constructs. I don't understand > the same reasons being applied to ALL the items. The same reasons are not applied to all of them; I have no idea why you keep asserting this. The counter-proposals clearly state the reasoning behind each individual element, and why they're valuable. There is then, additionally, a shared section listing some reasoning that is common to all the elements. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 15:46:58 UTC