- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:40:01 +0900
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:34:38 +0900, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 29.04.2010 10:26, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> ... >> To be clear: are you saying you object to the I18N WG's preferred >> resolution? If so, we will likely take this issue to a survey. >> ... > > Yes. It's not the HTML spec's job to restrict the contents of what can > go into meta/@http-equiv; in particular to make it's use non-conforming. I still don't understand why you think that is so. Servers never implemented the feature (and it was intended for them). User agents ended up implementing the feature in limited fashion. What is the problem with writing this down? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:41:04 UTC