- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:08:06 +0200
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On 29.04.2010 00:12, Phillips, Addison wrote: > On 9 April 2010, Ian Hickson proposed [1] a solution to Issue-88 that said in part: > > -- > SUMMARY > People are confused by the Content-Language pragma, so it should be made > non-conforming. > -- > > The Internationalization Core WG has officially endorsed this proposed solution [2]. Existing, legacy documents (and non-browser processes that use this markup) will not be harmed by this solution while this will eliminate the confusing (and not useful) overlap in language declaration. > > (for I18N Core), > > Addison > ... Again: the syntax inside meta/http-equiv is defined by the definitions of the HTTP headers; not HTML. This is a layer violation. Add discussions for client-side handling of specific values if you want, but don't break this feature. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:08:53 UTC