- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:56:57 -0400
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- CC: "'Shelley Powers'" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
On 04/22/2010 05:46 PM, John Foliot wrote: [snip] > > The cast has been set: there are two visions currently before the larger > Working Group regarding these semantic elements, there is a declared > deadline of May 6th for continued discussion and alternative proposals, > and there is a Consensus mechanism within the W3C that provides for a > means of quelling both filibuster and addressing minority dissent within > the overall goal of Consensus. Each will have their day. I agree with the above paragraph. As to the rest: I would have preferred that it not appear on public-html. This conversation looked like it was veering off course and a number of people (in particular: Maciej and Laura) had brought this back to discussions of the technical merits of the various proposals. I found this email to be unfortunate in that it creates the significant possibility of bringing this discussion back into unproductive territory. Note: I did not say whether I agreed or disagreed with any of the paragraphs I had elided, I simply said that I would have rather that they not have appeared on public-html. I will ask everybody to not respond to those paragraphs. > Respectfully > > JF - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:57:35 UTC