RE: Zero-edit Change Proposal for ISSUE-90 figure, ISSUE-91 aside, ISSUE-93 details, ISSUE-95 hidden, ISSUE-96 progress, and ISSUE-97 meter from John Foliot on 2010-04-22 (public-html@w3.org from April 2010)

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "'Shelley Powers'" <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, "'Jonas Sicking'" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "'Edward O'Connor'" <hober0@gmail.com>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <063b01cae253$ad8b7040$08a250c0$@edu>

Tab Atkins Jr.wrote:
>
> While I can't speak for the other editors of the counterproposal, I
> can assure you that I put in as much effort as I deemed reasonable to
> counter the arguments given, and not a jot less.

FWIW, so did I. I take both Shelley's Change Proposals and our collective 
response seriously. This is not personal, despite how Shelley appears to be 
casting it today (and in the past).

JF

Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:41:16 UTC