- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:45:46 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 04/15/2010 11:32 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 15.04.2010 17:21, Sam Ruby wrote: >> .. >> If you like, you can submit separate change proposals, but each must >> specify an actual proposal, and not a list of things that need to be >> solved or investigated. >> ... > > Ok, did so by removing the paragraph mentioning the alternative approach: > [snip] > > DETAILS > > Make the specified change controllers consistent. That removes the item to be investigated, but leaves the item to be solved. A change proposal must make an actual proposal. What do you propose the change controller for text/html to be? What do you propose that the change controller for text/html-sandboxed be? And why do you make that specific proposal? This level of information is necessary for the Working Group to evaluate the proposal, and ultimately make a decision. We can't hand the editor a decision that says "make this edit" unless we actually specify what that edit is. - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:46:15 UTC