Re: change proposal for issue-86, was: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals

On Apr 14, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> So, if we take the strongest possible interpretation, that the Atom  
> spec requires all of (1)-(4), then any conversion along the lines of  
> what is in the HTML spec fundamentally conflicts with the Atom spec;  
> converting from HTML to Atom would be automatically nonconforming to  
> Atom unless the HTML has embedded globally unique IDs. If that's the  
> case, and we care about Atom conformance

I meant to say:

"If that's the case, and we care about Atom conformance, then the only  
possible fix is to remove the feature."

Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:26:24 UTC