Re: change proposal for issue-86, was: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Given that discussion has died down, and that this proposal has gotten 
> several indications of support and (as of yet) no objections, at this 
> time I would like anybody in the Working Group that has reason to object 
> to this item to state so now.  If none come forward, the chairs will 
> issue a Call for Consensus.

If the W3C HTML WG does not want to define a mapping from HTML to Atom, 
then I'm happy to remove it from the W3C copy of the spec. However, the 
text would remain in the WHATWG copy as the WHATWG has received feedback 
asking for such a mapping to be defined, and defining one seems harmless.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 19:59:25 UTC