- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:59:03 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > I disagree it's irrelevant. > > For instance, the fact that people who were supposed to be the target > audience of sandboxing aren't interested may indicate that we should > consider to reduce the "badness" of the sandbox proposal, by killing a very > specific part of it, but keeping the rest. Ah, now that's relevant in the vein that I mentioned, where it may not be useful to reduce network requests, for example if the sandbox security model is only going to be used in places where a network request is required anyway (such as for serving ads). I've provided my reasons as to why I think that isn't necessarily a strong argument against, though. Thanks, Julian. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:59:58 UTC