- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:11:07 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 04/09/2010 10:04 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> Note: the removal of this part should be applied to all variants of the >> spec, be it in W3C space or not. > > Paraphrasing Maciej[1]: > > As a side note, be aware that a Change Proposal cannot stop anyone from > proposing any additional drafts they want. A Change Proposal can only change > existing drafts or propose new drafts. Thus, the sentence quoted above > cannot be fulfilled by adopting a Change Proposal. We[2] suggest removing > this sentence for clarity. If this Change Proposal is adopted by the Working > group without that sentence being removed, then that specific sentence will > be considered inoperative. Additionally, I don't see how a W3C decision could affect non-W3C documents, such as the WhatWG copy, which it seems like the above text is trying to mandate? / Jonas
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 19:12:05 UTC