- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:52:02 +1000
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
This was driven by requests from HTML5 folks, who felt that it made the algorithm too complex and error-prone. If your application needs to consider registered types as URIs, there's nothing stopping it from using a URI prefix as a name space; e.g., that of the registry. Cheers, On 09/04/2010, at 4:34 AM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 10:10 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09.txt > > I can't believe I've only just noticed this, but: registered link types > are no longer URIs?! That sucks! > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 01:52:35 UTC