- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > Ian Hickson, Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:37:29 +0000 (UTC): > > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Richard Ishida wrote: > > We can make the pragma entirely non-conforming instead of conforming > > with a warning, if that would help. [...] > > As surprise to the Mozilla community? What about the just mentioned > "matching implementations" motto? [1] Making it non-conforming doesn't affect implementations, see the change proposal. It only affects authors and validators. > In zero change proposal (Mark IV) you claim: [2] > > ]] > POSITIVE EFFECTS > * Encourages authoring behaviour compatible with both legacy user > agents > and with conforming user agents. > [[ > > But here is an example to prove that it is not true: > > div[lang=""]:lang(en){background:red} That's got nothing to do with Content-Language processing; the same bug can be shown purely with lang="" attributes. Gecko doesn't implement the part of HTML5 that says that "" is to be treated as a language code. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 00:55:29 UTC