Re: change proposal for issue-86, was: ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals

On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:09 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Also, it's not clear *at all* whether this is a feature that people  
> really want, and if they do, whether it needs to be part of HTML5.  
> Given the fact that it's non-trivial to generate a valid Atom feed  
> from HTML, but the reverse *is* trivial, we should also consider  
> removing this feature altogether (I'd be happy to write a 2nd change  
> proposal if people want to see that as well). (See [2])

Since a number of people have expressed interest, I think it would be  
helpful to provide a second proposal along these lines.


Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:12:43 UTC