- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:12:45 +0200
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 24.03.2010 05:55, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> >>> - That being said, I think a reference to ISO/IEC 646 would be >>> acceptable as well; this one is re-published by ECMA as ECMA-006, >>> which is available online >>> (<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-006.htm>) >> >> Ian, would a reference to ISO/IEC 646 aka ECMA-006 be acceptable to you? > > I think debating this is a waste of our time and am not willing to get > drawn into a discussion of the topic. > ... I read that as "no". This was two weeks ago. Can we please finally have a call for counter proposals, or move directly to a call for consensus? Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:13:28 UTC