- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:36:34 +0200
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 06.04.2010 23:30, Shelley Powers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> On 04/06/2010 05:10 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: >>> >>> I'm not going to formally object to this interesting segue in the >>> procedure, but I believe that anyone that writes one counter to all is >>> doing so with the assumption that the co-chairs and group have already >>> made a decision regardless of the strengths of the argument. This >>> assumption is more likely trigger me to file a Formal Objection if my >>> changes are rejected. >> >> Issues 1 and 2 were decided together. >> > > Same counter-proposal? There's been so many lately, I can't remember > what was what. > ... Issue #1 was about the protocol used for a/@ping. Issue #2 was about UI requirements. Roy wrote a change proposal addressing both by removing the feature completely. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:37:09 UTC