Re: Gloss standard terminology for resource/representation (ISSUE-81 Change Proposal)

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Dan Connolly wrote:
> This is informed by discussion with lots of people, but nobody else has 
> looked at it, so it's just from me.
> I understand proposals were due January 16, 2010; I hope this proposal 
> will get some consideration even though it's late.

Just out of interest, is there any particular reason why the proposal 
explicitly calls out the HTTP and URI specs rather than focusing on 
consistency with other W3C specs?

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:31:37 UTC