Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-88 (mark II)

On 03.04.2010 18:17, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>
>> Ian Hickson, Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:54:23 +0000 (UTC):
>> []
>>> RATIONALE
>> []
>>> The same change proposal also suggests a second change, namely to change
>>> the syntax to allow multiple comma-separated language codes, even though
>>> all but the first would be ignored.
>>>
>>> User agents do not pay any attention to values after the first.
>>
>> Incorrect: Except Mozilla browsers (which looks at *all* the language
>> tags in the list), user agents do not pay attention to <meta>
>> content-language at all when it contains a comma-separated list.
>
> Do you have a test case that demonstrates this? Seems like that would be
> a useful addition to the discussion.

I agree that to see a test case would be nice.

That being said, that should apply to Ian's original claim as well, right?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 17:36:25 UTC