Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-88 (mark II)

On 02.04.2010 20:54, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> ISSUE-88
> ========
>
> SUMMARY
> There is no problem and the proposed remedy is to change nothing.
>
> RATIONALE
> There is no problem.
> ...

There is a problem, as long as HTML5 pretends that it can state what is 
allowed in http-equiv. It's simply not HTML5's business. Maybe this 
needs a more generic tracker issue being raised after all...

I'm happy with the spec having recommendations how to use certain 
values, and also to define things it has been abused for (such as 
refresh), but that's all it should do.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 2 April 2010 20:12:21 UTC