Re: ISSUE-96 Change Proposal

On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:

> This discussion is become circular, evidently most people disagree
> with me. That's fine. I don't agree, but will take my arguments
> elsewhere.
> Most of my proposals were about removing these so-called "semantic
> elements". If the co-chairs want to close these proposals, since no
> one agrees with me, that's fine too.

The Chairs are very much interested in seeing the level of support or  
opposition for this proposal, and the other similar proposals for  
removing elements. That would be useful feedback for determining the  
next action.

So far, my read on this discussion is that a number of people disagree  
with the proposal, some have expressed concerns without taking a firm  
stance, and no one besides Shelley has voiced support. So far, I have  
not seen direct comments on the other proposals.

We will be monitoring the ongoing discussion.


Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 19:41:04 UTC