- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:47:09 -0400
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/31/2010 08:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Mar 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> Ooh, maybe we can adopt as resolution to ISSUE-94 a WG decision that >> these things should be split out, and that this will happen as soon as >> there is an editor for the separate spec. But that if no such editor >> steps up by the time we reach CR then the split will not happen for >> this version of HTML. >> >> Would that be an acceptable solution to everyone? > [snip] > > Let's say we handled it that way. This would be more or less equivalent > to recording the issue as closed without prejudice. "Closed without > prejudice" means we will not treat the issue as a blocker for Last Call, > but will give it due consideration if anyone comes forward with a > concrete proposal before CR. > > I would be hesitant to record something more specific, such as that the > WG will definitely agree to the split if certain conditions are met. +1 - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 00:48:03 UTC