- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:41:43 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: >> Could you elaborate on how this doesn't work with the rules in HTML5? (Or >> rather, with the rules in Adam's ID?) > > That resource is served with a text/plain mime type, and therefore should > not be treated as a feed. Perhaps we should change the algorithm to consider these documents to be feeds. > At the present time, both IE8 and Firefox treat that document as a feed. > My assessment is that Firefox will continue to follow IE's lead in this > area, but I will gladly defer to those who actually work on the product. That sounds like another argument for changing the algorithm. Adam
Received on Friday, 29 May 2009 20:42:34 UTC