- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:10:08 -0400
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com > <mailto:annevk@opera.com>> wrote: > > On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:18:11 +0200, Shelley Powers > <shelley.just@gmail.com <mailto:shelley.just@gmail.com>> wrote: > > In fact, that's my biggest concern: that discussions should occur > > directly between RDFa and HTML5 folks are not happening, > happening offline, or > > snarkily, in IRC ( > > > http://lastweekinhtml5.blogspot.com/2009/05/rdfa-guys-wake-up-and-smell-pilgrims.html). > > What do you mean? At least Sam Ruby and Philip Taylor are debating > the technical issues with the RDFa crowd right on this mailing list. > > I meant exactly what I said: it would have been helpful to have folks > who have implemented RDFa libraries in JS participating, because they > will have the best understanding of the issues. That's not a > condemnation of the folks, just an observation that the discussion isn't > as inclusive as it need be. The most I can do is make *this* place hospitable. If there are issues that are preventing others from participating here, I ask that Chris and I be informed as to what these issues (either on-list or off-list) are and I am committed to resolving them. I hope that the folks that have implemented RDFa libraries in JS do chose to participate when they are ready. - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 17:11:00 UTC