- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 08:30:58 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009 16:38:59 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > wrote: >> The section is labeled. Now the section needs to be included in a >> specification whose title, subtitle, or abstract heralds that >> material. > > While I do not necessarily disagree, there is precedence for this. > E.g. SVG Tiny 1.2 does not mention in the title/subtitle/abstract > that it includes a network, timing, and XML parser API. It does not > even mention it covers APIs for the elements defined within the > specification. I'm not sure this is problematic. Everyone skimming > through the specification will notice it. > > Having said that, I wouldn't mind holding ourselves to a higher > standard. The WHATWG abstract needs updating anyway to reflect the > extraction of various features and the W3C abstract could use an > update too. Given that the extractions are not complete, perhaps it would be best for the update can wait. - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 12:31:40 UTC