W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

RE: Design Principles

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:22:14 -0700
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118CD8A48AB@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>

> Before we start changing the title and the abstract it would  
> help if you made the concerns more explicit first.

If the Design Principles document content is on the agenda,
then we can discuss it, but it seemed like there was 
significant objection to continuing to discuss the 
principles themselves.

I suggested a title and abstract as a way of breaking the
impasse and moving on. Do you have some other plan for
making progress?

Are you asking me to critique the HTML document against
these design prinicples, the design principles themselves,
or something else?

Were the suggested amended telcon minutes[1] unclear?
For other examples of actual design principles used not in
the DP document, I'd start with the introduction[2],
which identifies many intended design considerations.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0232.html

[2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#introduction

Focusing on the design principles used or referenced in
the actual document might be more productive than discussing
a document that seems like it was abandoned a while ago.


Received on Sunday, 24 May 2009 19:23:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:47 UTC