- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:22:14 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Anne: > Before we start changing the title and the abstract it would > help if you made the concerns more explicit first. If the Design Principles document content is on the agenda, then we can discuss it, but it seemed like there was significant objection to continuing to discuss the principles themselves. I suggested a title and abstract as a way of breaking the impasse and moving on. Do you have some other plan for making progress? Are you asking me to critique the HTML document against these design prinicples, the design principles themselves, or something else? Were the suggested amended telcon minutes[1] unclear? For other examples of actual design principles used not in the DP document, I'd start with the introduction[2], which identifies many intended design considerations. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0232.html [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#introduction Focusing on the design principles used or referenced in the actual document might be more productive than discussing a document that seems like it was abandoned a while ago. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Sunday, 24 May 2009 19:23:06 UTC