- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:59:16 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On May 20, 2009, at 3:46 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> 3) The issue about what the document itself is named (raised by Roy >> Fielding[2]) is also something that needs to be resolved. This issue >> primarily affects the title page and little else. > > The title of the document is not a technical issue, so I don't think > we need to give a great deal of consideration to minority objectors. > Particularly when the proposed alternative is (a) inaccurate on the > face of it; (b) intended to downplay the value of the spec. I think we > should let the spec be titled by people who are generally in agreement > with its technical direction, and then assess consensus on its > technical contents, rather than changing the title to suit the > preferences of those who disagree with the contents. > > Regards, > Maciej > > > Point of clarification: exactly what is a "minority objector"? Shelley
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 14:00:08 UTC