- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:36:03 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, RDFa Community <public-rdfa@w3.org>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > Shelley Powers wrote: >> Sam Ruby wrote: >>> Shane McCarron wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> Thanks to you all for encouraging me to create a draft profile for >>>> RDFa in HTML 4. This document has no official standing of course - >>>> it is just something we at ApTest have been using for a while as a >>>> way of pushing metadata into traditional web sites and user agents. >>>> >>>> You can find the latest version at >>>> http://www3.aptest.com/standards/rdfa-html/ >>>> >>>> Feel free to send comments to me directly or to the >>>> public-rdfa@w3.org list if you want to share them with the >>>> community. I look forward to seeing what you think! >>> >>> A promising start! >>> >>> I would hope that we could work together to get HTML 5 included and >>> the various issues that have been discussed to date resolved. >>> >>> - Sam Ruby >>> >>> >>> >> Absolutely excellent Shane. >> >> Thank you so much for doing this, and I'm eagerly looking forward to >> spending time with your document today and this evening. >> >> I'm also hoping that other members of the HTML WG read the document, >> and provide you feedback. Perhaps attached to this new topic posting. >> >> Shelley >> >> > I also wanted to mention that I've volunteered to Ian Hickson to > convert this document into section format for inclusion in the HTML5 > document for review. > > Not long ago, Ian mentioned that he was looking for volunteer editors. > I'm not precisely an RDFa expert, but others who are have volunteered > to help ensure that what I produce will work for the RDFa community, > and I'm sure that additional feedback from the HTML WG would ensure > what I create would work for the HTML5 working group. > > Normally I would assume we would write a proposal and then submit for > review, but the HTML WG operates under the CTR (commit-than-review) > process, so we'll need to get this section committed to the HTML5 > document, first, in order to do an effective review. > > I don't think we have to produce more use cases in order to justify > this new addition--the editor seems to have deemed them sufficient to > make a modification to the HTML5 document. > > Shelley > > Sorry, last email Correction on this: not to include this proposal (once it's finalized, I know this is first draft), as a formal part of HTML5, but to ensure that a document incorporating RDFa in HTML5 will validate. My excitement over the specification got away from me, Shelley
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 20:36:54 UTC