- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:17:28 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm very concerned about what's going on here in the spec -- see >> <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#vcard>. >> >> This mainly replicates information from the IETF vCard spec (RFC >> 2739). I realize that the author may think that that spec is not >> sufficient; but the right way to fix this is to participate in >> revising it (see >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-07> and >> <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/vcarddav/>), not by creating a copy in W3C >> space. >> >> Best regards, Julian > > In the meantime, the spec also replicates information from RFC 2446 > (iCalendar), soon to be obsoleted by > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis-09>. See > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#vevent>. > > BR, Julian > > > Yes, Ian and Tantek don't have a high opinion of how the IETF operates http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20090514#l-12 Shelley
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 12:18:17 UTC