- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:27:13 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, robert@ocallahan.org, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: >> Or is the relevant text somewhere in the >> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#concept-media-load-resource >> section? > > That is the relevant algorith, yes; specifically the second and third > cases in the first set of cases in the list in step 3. OK, then agreed that this allows sniffing of the video data if the type is not provided. Note that Gecko, at least, sniffs all HTTP responses without a Content-Type header, and after that treats them all effectively as metadata-provided. It sounds like doing that is fundamentally incompatible with this specification, though, unless we teach our sniffer to recognize video/audio types by data, not just by extension... -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 22:28:23 UTC