- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:55:10 -0700
- To: mike@w3.org
- Cc: shelley.just@gmail.com, ian@hixie.ch, public-html@w3.org
Mcihael, based on what you say, I'm curious to know what if anything happened to the document you yourself started --- from all appearances it seems to be dead and buried. Michael(tm) Smith writes: > Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, 2009-06-23 19:03 -0500: > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > Unlike you and Sam, I'm not paid to waste my time writing material > > that I know will be rejected. > > As far as this working group goes, I think it's clear that any > material you might write is not going to be rejected. After he > came on as co-chair of the group, Sam outlined a mechanism for > having additional/alternative HTML-WG-member-edited drafts move > forward for discussion within the group and publication by the > group. I know Chris Wilson supports that, and I'd think it'd be > safe to say the majority of members of this group also support it. > > > While you're a gatekeeper I won't play the gam. > > Hixie is not the gatekeeper for decisions about what gets > published by this group. > > > I will spend my time writing, but it will be in the nature of > > formal objections, which cannot be ignored. > > IMHO, the most useful kind of formal objections are those that > take the form of a concrete proposal -- a document with (as Sam as > described it), "camera-ready spec text". > > And I would think that at the point in the publication cycle where > resolving formal objections is necessary (document transitions -- > e.g., from WD to LC, or LC to CR), the arbitrator responsible for > resolving those is very likely to value having concrete proposals > or alternative drafts to consult when evaluating them. > > That said, I'm not saying the objections necessarily need to reach > that point (or should). > > --Mike > > -- > Michael(tm) Smith > http://people.w3.org/mike/ -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 17:55:55 UTC