- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:57:29 -0500
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Catherine Roy <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>, Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, Philip TAYLOR <p.taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Steve wrote: > The original email from laura was about modifying the HTML 5 design > principles, whether or not individual players have been adhering to > the spirit or intention of the modifications is neither here nor > there. Exactly. > The current thread does not address the merits of the proposed > wording, which that should be what the debate is about. Thoughts anyone? > besides, if you [Ian] feel you have been acting in accordance with the > suggested text, then there should be no issue with it no? Is there anyone who cannot live with the proposed wording? Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 11:58:26 UTC