- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > As you may be aware, yesterday I wrote a blog post encouraging people to > > review the HTML5 spec. [1] > > > > This effort is intended to support a more thorough linear scan, week by > > week, section by section, through the HTML5 draft, which the chairs will be > > conducting in this working group from April through July in advance of the > > goal of reaching "Last Call" in October. > > It may be helpful to do this iteratively, particularly as this document has > not been developed using the traditional W3C approach. In particular, it > probably makes sense to discuss the following two items further because > depending on how they get resolved, much work can be saved: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Apr/0001.html > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478665#c1 Could I request a report from the chairs summarising the conclusions that have been drawn from the past two months of discussions on the above topics? I am a big fan of saving work, so if it was concluded that work could be saved I would be much pleased. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 17:08:34 UTC