- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:36:34 -0400
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, public-html@w3.org
Le 14 juin 2009 à 18:26, Shelley Powers a écrit : > For FONT, there is no author conformance requirements, because it > looks like this element is either missing, or has been pulled. […] > I'm wondering if we couldn't have an Accessibility Best Practices > document in addition to a HTML5 "well formed" best practices, […] > Come to that, we could have a Semantic Best Practices that provides > conformance criteria for using microformats and RDFa in a document, […] > With this approach, we could also remove the microdata section, and > either have the elements and attributes in a separate best practice > document Orthogonal technologies :))) http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#orthogonal-specs -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 01:37:04 UTC