Re: &foo= in attribute values (and why defining conformance matters)

On 6/12/09 6:22 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> It defines what QA tools like conformance checkers

Oh, I forgot to mention: "conformance checker" is an incredibly vapid 
piece of newspeak. They're only checking "conformance" because you 
classified large parts of the working, interoperable grammar as such.

- Rob

Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 22:50:22 UTC